AMBERCHROM? PROFILE? HPR10 Improving Performance for Peptide Purification - - Chromatography Online
AMBERCHROM? PROFILE? HPR10 Improving Performance for Peptide Purification
Pages | 1 | 2
more

Introduction


Table 1: Conditions.
The use of ion-pairing agents in reversed-phase chromatography is quite common, and the effect of mobile phase composition on reversed-phase separations has been extensively studied in recent years. The addition of neutral salts can greatly affect the adsorption behaviour of ionizable compounds on reversed-phase packings.1-4 However, most of this research has involved small molecular weight organic compounds, not larger molecules such as peptides or proteins. Additionally, the majority of this work has been conducted using only silica reversed-phase packing materials.

Therefore, in order to better understand the effect of neutral salts on peptide separations, a polymeric reversed-phase packing material, Amberchrom™ HPR10, was selected for the purification of recombinant human insulin. The purifications were conducted with and without the addition of a neutral salt in the mobile phase.

Experimental


Figure 1: Insulin purification with sodium salts.
Recombinant human insulin expressed from yeast (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) was purified using sodium citrate, sodium sulphate, ammonium acetate or ammonium sulphate in a buffered Milli-Q® water/acetonitrile gradient on an Amberchrom™ Profile™ HPR10 column. The influent purity of the human insulin was ~92%. All separations were done using an Agilent 1100 HPLC system and the conditions are listed below.

Results and Conclusions


Figure 2: Insulin purification with ammonium salts.
As can be seen in Figures 1 and 2, the addition of 50 mM salt has a profound effect on the elution profile. In general, the elution profiles are much tighter with the addition of salt to mobile phase. Also the amount of mass per fraction was much higher when compared to the insulin purification done without salt.


Figure 3: Insulin purification yield/purity curves.
Figure 3 compares the yield/purity curves for the different purification conditions. The ammonium salts provided superior yields and purities when compared with the purifications using no salt or purifications using sodium salts. The sodium salts did increase the mass per fraction and gave a tighter elution profile, however, the overall yield using these salts was inferior to the other purifications. This was especially true with the sodium citrate purification. Ammonium sulphate provided the best overall purification, although the yield at 100% purity was slightly lower than that provided by ammonium acetate.

John Fisher, John Maikner, Amie Gehris, Marlin Kinzey and Mark Vander Hoff, Rohm and Haas Company, Advanced Biosciences, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.


Pages | 1 | 2
more

ADVERTISEMENT

post a comment
Your email address will NOT be published.
appears with your comment
read our privacy policy
Note: does not support HTML
All Comments submitted are subject to review, and may be delayed before posting. Comments will be posted at the discretion of the editor.

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertiser Gallery
Source: LCGC Europe,
Click here