For the last six months, "LC Troubleshooting" has been concentrating on the process for the development of isocratic methods
(those for which the mobile phase composition is constant throughout the run). This worked through the sequence of goal setting,1 selecting the right starting conditions,2 adjusting retention,3 changing peak spacing4,5 and fine-tuning the column efficiency.6 Hopefully you have gained additional insight into the liquid chromatography (LC) process, as well, so your methods will be
less likely to fail and will be easier to troubleshoot.
The first step in getting an acceptable separation is to get the retention times in the right general region.3 This is often is accomplished by changing the mobile phase organic content (%B) for a reversed-phase separation in 10% increments
from 100% organic until the retention factors k are in the range of 1–20, or better yet, 2–10. Because peaks move in a regular fashion as the mobile phase strength is changed,
we can generalize the effect of solvent strength as "The Rule of Three". This states that the k-values change by approximately three-fold for each 10% change in organic. Because k changes three times per 10% change, a 20% change will result in approximately 3 × three-fold, or roughly 10-fold. Using such
guidelines and a little common sense, we can usually find isocratic conditions that give us the 1 < k < 20 or 2 < k < 10 retention times in three to five runs. Wouldn't it be nice to be able to find these conditions in the very first run?
Well, with the help of a gradient scouting run, you usually can. The use of a gradient scouting run to speed isocratic method
development is the subject of this month's "LC Troubleshooting."
Where to Start?
 Figure 1
|
A very efficient way to start an isocratic method development project is to make the first run as a scouting gradient run.
With isocratic runs, you cannot often anticipate where peaks will come out in the first chromatogram, so you are forced to
start with a solvent that is too strong (for example, 90% or 100% B). Then you work to weaker solvents in 10 or 20% steps
using "The Rule of Three" for a guide until you achieve 2 < k < 10 for your sample. With gradient elution, you can predict in advance conditions that are likely to give the gradient equivalent
of 2 < k < 10. This will occur for small molecules (molecular weights < 1000 Da) for full-range gradients that comprise ≈25 column
volumes of solvent. For example, if we use the column recommended for starting with an LC–UV method,2 a 150 mm × 4.6 mm column packed with 5 μm particles, the column volume is approximately 0.01 × the column length (in millimetres),
or ≈1.5 mL. This means that the gradient should be ≈37.5 column volumes; a 20 min gradient at 2 mL/min (40 mL volume) is close
enough. For an unknown sample, we don't know the polarity range, so it is best to run a full-range gradient of 5–95% or 5–100%
organic solvent (keep the percentage of organic solvent greater than 5% to avoid column dewetting). An example of such a gradient
scouting run is shown in Figure 1 (the chromatogram is only shown until the last peak has been eluted).
Evaluating the Scouting Run
The first question after we run the scouting run should be, "Is a gradient or an isocratic run best for this sample?" An easy
way to make this evaluation is to examine the fraction of the run time occupied by peaks. If the peaks take ≤25% of the run
time, an isocratic run is the best choice. If ≥40% of the run is occupied by peaks, a gradient is advised. Between these limits,
either an isocratic or gradient run can be possible.
In the instance of Figure 1, the first peak is eluted at ≈10 min and the last peak at ≈12 min. So (12 – 10)/20 = 10%, which
is less than 25%, so an isocratic run is recommended. There are several ways to select the isocratic conditions at this point,
but one of the easiest is to use an Excel spreadsheet calculator that you can download for free from the LC Resources website
(reference 7, go to the "Resources" page and download the file "scouting_gradients.xls").
 Figure 2
|
The use of this calculator is shown in Figure 2. In the top section, fill in the run conditions for the scouting run. In this
case, a 150 mm × 4.6 mm (15 cm × 0.46 cm) column was used. The equipment dwell volume was 1.5 mL and the flow-rate was 2.0
mL/min. The gradient was run from 5 to 100% organic in 20 min. At the bottom left, enter the retention times for the first
(10.0 min) and last (12.0 min) peaks. The calculator then recommends the type of method for the next run (isocratic for this
example) and conditions for the run (44% organic). I usually round this number to the nearest 5% for convenience. If you insist
on running a gradient method, the conditions for the next run are shown (40–55% in 3 min), which adjusts the gradient to remove
most of the wasted time before the first peak and after the last peak are eluted.
The calculator requires that you know the dwell volume of your LC system. This is the volume from the point the solvents are
mixed until they reach the head of the column. The calculation should be done for every LC system, and is straightforward
using the directions in references 8 or 9, Section 4.3.1.2. High-pressure-mixing systems typically have dwell volumes in the
1.5–3.0 mL range, whereas low-pressure-mixing systems are a little larger, with typical volumes of 2.5–4.0 mL. LC systems
designed for small-volume applications such as LC–mass spectrometry (MS) often have dwell volumes of 0.2–0.5 mL.